How Anyone Can Retire In 10 Years (or less)

Surprisingly, it’s not that hard.

It doesn’t require hitting the lottery or inheriting a windfall from ol’ Aunt Myrtle. Similarly, you don’t have to become a brilliant investor or possess any unusual skill.

Also, the title claimed “anyone” can do it so  the strategy has to be repeatable and predictable. We’re talking science – not random luck.

In a word, the answer is “frugality” – extreme frugality by most people’s standards – accompanied by basic investing.

Anyone can do it, but almost nobody will… and therein lies the rub.

Let’s start by proving the theory with mathematics, and then we will explore the rest of the strategy in greater depth…

How The Math of Saving Your Way To Early Retirement Works

Let’s play with some simple equations to illustrate the point…

We will assume $48,000 per year earned income to keep the taxes low and the math easy. Alternatively, you could just assume 48K after taxes and eliminate the tax complication from the equation. That works out to 4K per month spendable.

(BTW – the actual income level is irrelevant to the calculation as you will see below so use whatever income works for you. The key is the percentage of income that is dedicated to savings.)

Using one of my handy retirement calculators, we will determine how long it takes to save your way to financial independence applying industry standard numbers like 8% for investment return and 3% spendable retirement income to support living expenses.

If you saved 70% of your income or $2,800 per month at 8% return you would have $515,000 at the end of 10 years. Yes, I know that leaves you only $14,400 per year to live on (I will address this issue later), but the fact is you will be financially independent in 10 years because 3% of $515K is $15,450 in spendable income. This would be $1,000 per year greater than what you had been living on.

(If that math went by a little too fast and you want more detail then read this ebook – How Much Money Do I Need To Retire. It explains everything in step-by-step detail… plus a whole lot more.)

If you’re really in a hurry to tell you boss what he can do with your job and don’t mind extreme frugality then try saving 80%. You could be financially independent in less than 7 years because $3,200 per month at 8% results in a $361,000 savings balance providing $10,830 of annual spendable income at 3%. This is greater than the $9,600 ($800 per month) you would be living on for this scenario.

Quieting the Naysayers

The first and most obvious comment nearly every reader will have to these two examples is something like, “Cute idea, Todd, but I can’t even get by on 100% of my income. The idea of living on 20-30% is a pathetic joke! Your article is complete rubbish!”

(Come on… own up to it. The little voice in your head was saying something like that. Right?)

Here’s the rub. That is only true for the people making those lifestyle choices. It is not “the truth”.

There are many people who have committed to extreme frugality as a lifestyle choice because they don’t want to spend any more of their life than absolutely necessary working for money. They would sooner live without the luxuries that others have claimed are necessities than pay the price of working to have all that stuff.

It is an expression of personal values. There are people who choose to live in motorhomes, use all public transport or bicycle, shop only at thrift stores, grow their own food, and so on to keep expenses to a bare minimum. It can be done. It is possible if that is your choice.

Alternatively, living on 20-30% of income does not have to equate to extreme frugality. Try running the same numbers with 250K or 300K in income. It leaves plenty of spending money for lifestyle today. Sure, it is far less than you could afford at that income level, but again, it is a choice.

In fact, I initially built my wealth following this exact formula. It totally works. I just raised my income to a very high level, paid my house off, and never got frivolous but never suffered. I chose my spending consciously based on my values (personal growth, reading, research, outdoor sports, adventure, and recreation) and never needed to spend much of the fat income. The bulk went to savings with little effort or discipline. Presto! Instant financial freedom.

So anyway, it does work, and it is do-able. People do it every day.

Others might attack the 3% spending rule or the 8% return on investment. My answer is save your breath.

3% spending is easy to support in perpetuity because a portfolio of quality dividend stocks would pay that (and likely more) while growing to adjust for inflation and without ever touching principal. It is easily do-able.

Similarly, 8% growth during the 10 years in this example is supportable using investment strategies designed to safely support growth that I teach my financial coaching clients. However, even if you disagree with me on this point the argument is moot because the compound return represents very little of the asset accumulation over this short time period. The math is dependent on the percentage savings rate – not the growth rate. It helps, but it isn’t critical. The time is just too short to make a big difference. So anyway, don’t waste your energy arguing details – it all boils down to the savings rate.

Also, notice that I didn’t include Social Security, pensions, or anything else. This is simple, stripped down math to make a minimalist point that is unarguably clear. Anyone can retire and live with financial independence (but not freedom) in 10 years or less. It is absolutely, 100% do-able.

I’ve done it, lot’s of other people have done it, and there is a whole web site community run by Jacob at EarlyRetirementExtreme.com of people trying to walk the talk. If you are a naysayer then just be honest with yourself and realize your negativity is all about a lifestyle choice – not the viability of the strategy.

With that said, the reality is very few people will ever succeed with this approach. Let’s look at why…

Why So Few Succeed

You probably already guessed why so few people are able to follow this plan…

It takes the self-discipline of a celibate monk living in a brothel to survive on 20-30% of what most people earn in our current culture. I did it easily because my income was substantial while living the simple life as a single male. It would have been much harder if I was married with kids on an average income.

Does that mean you can discount this article and throw the idea away? No!

The math is the math. I’m teaching you how saving your way to financial independence works.

This is one of three paths to financial independence (the other two are real estate and owning your own business) and the rules are inviolable. They are scripture in stone. You can’t argue with them. It is just math.

You can reduce the savings rate and lengthen the time, but you cannot change the math.

  • Staying with the example above, a 25% savings rate ($1,000 per month) compounds to roughly $1,149,000 in 27 years where it will finally replace the 75% of your earned income you are spending. This example is not as rock-solid because the time period is much longer meaning you have to start including inflation and other complicating factors to make it realistic; however, the principle demonstrated is consistent.
  • A 10% savings rate in our simplified example requires a traditional career duration of 40-45 years to make sense of the numbers. It is the classic retirement savings formula most people are taught to follow – save 10-15% throughout a normal career duration to replace 80-90% of earned income  – but few actually ever do it.

There are a couple of key principles you want to understand with this strategy…

  1. The critical factor to success is the percentage saved from earnings. Every 10% increase in spending adds a little more than 3+ years to the process because it not only decreases how much you save but it increases the threshold of spending your assets must overcome as well. It is a double-edged sword.
  2. Investment return and inflation have very little effect when the time period is short (high savings rate). However, investment return and inflation have a huge compounded effect when the time period is long (low or traditional savings rate). You must plan accordingly.
  3. Almost nobody is motivated enough by financial independence to persist with a frugality discipline for 10 years and then survive on the same level of income for a lifetime. That is why so few people ever achieve financial independence following this path.

Frankly, I question if it is even a worthwhile goal as stated in this post here.

Questioning Your Goal

All of this begs the question, “Is your goal financial freedom or financial independence?”

Surprisingly, they aren’t the same thing.

You can be financially independent on $15,000 per year in 10 years or less with the above example, but you will have to give up some freedom to achieve it.

Living low on the economic scale limits what you can buy and do with your life. These limitations are antithetical to freedom and cause what I call a “poverty mentality”. Every corner must be cut, every dime squeezed for maximum blood. It creates an obsession with spending and money that doesn’t equate to happiness for most people.

Unless your values are EXTREMELY frugal you will constantly make concessions to save money as decisions are based on the right side of the menu of life (prices). Rather than work for money you will spend a comparable amount of life energy working to save money through all the frugality strategies required to make ends meet.

This is not a right/wrong question – it is just reality. It takes effort to figure out how to spend less and survive on less. Money buys convenience, but that convenience comes at a price because you have to give your life energy in the form of work to earn it in the first place. It is all just trade-offs. There is no perfect answer.

For example, extreme frugality would limit my ability to take my family to France for a month (like I did last year) which honors my values for adventure and life experience. I wouldn’t be able to honor my values on education by paying for quality, private, school for my kids. I wouldn’t be able to honor my health values by paying for professional services like sports training, physical therapy, or expensive organic food. All these things would be luxuries in a world dominated by frugality thinking.

These would all be limitations to my freedom and would dishonor my values. In my personal experience that is antithetical to true wealth and personal freedom. Others would disagree, but that doesn’t make them wrong.

It is all a question of values…

Integrate Your Plan With Your Values

Extreme frugality is not everyone’s cup of tea. It works fabulously for some people, and it’s a recipe for misery for others.

The key is to integrate your plan for financial freedom with your values. The two must be congruent because the goal isn’t just financial independence: the goal is true wealth and personal freedom.

For example, the spending level that honors my values as a 50 year-old, middle class, head-household, family of four is much higher than when I was a single male straight out of college. It is probably higher than it will be 10 years from now when my kids are grown.

You must design a financial plan to reflect whatever reality is true for you. That is always the starting point when I begin working with coaching clients. We co-design a wealth plan for financial freedom that integrates every aspect of their life: values, spending, life habits, skills, resources, interests and abilities.

We define their leverage points and competitive advantage into a plan specific to their needs. Some clients save their way to wealth using the formulas discussed here. Others choose real estate and/or building a business to better leverage their passions and interests (this employs entirely different equations beyond the scope of this article). Most use some combination of these three paths to wealth (I usually encourage two of the three paths).

One size does not fit all. Your wealth plan must fit you like a favorite pair of jeans in order for you to succeed with it. It must comfortably wrap every curve and unique attribute of your being or it won’t feel right and you won’t stick with it long enough to succeed.

Getting your plan right is the first step to financial freedom on which all subsequent decisions and actions are built.

One Out Of Three Paths To Wealth

In summary, the purpose of this article was to illustrate how the rules of frugality and saving your way to wealth can be applied within your wealth plan. It is one of three potential paths to wealth.

Traditional savings strategies are usually the primary choice (coupled with real estate) for W2 employees who lack entrepreneurial dreams. Entrepreneurs will typically build wealth through their business and park that wealth in paper assets or real estate. There is no such thing as one-size-fits-all when it comes to wealth planning. It is a very personal choice.

How fast you want to achieve your wealth goals through savings (7 years or 40 years?) is purely a lifestyle choice and a statement of your personal values and priorities. The paths you choose to realize your financial dreams should reflect your life situation.

The thing to note about paper asset savings plans is they are governed by specific mathematical rules and limitations. If you want to break out of those mathematical rules and get more creative then you must include the other two asset categories – real estate and business.

… which is why they will be subjects of future articles so stay tuned.

Finally, if building and implementing a customized wealth plan based on proven principles catches your interest then this article explains how you can get started coaching with me.

Let me know how I can help…

You Might Also Like…

First Name:
Primary Email:



If this page helped you then please let your friends know about it also with a like, tweet, or +1. Thanks for sharing...


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Shaun 7 pts

Just shared this article on facebook. Simply fantastic. I'm trying to "walk the walk" too, and as a 22-year-old who doesn't have a college degree, if I can do it, anyone can. And yes, I'm absolutely on my way.I'm excited I found this site. You found yourself another subscriber. :) 

Financialmentor 5 pts moderator

 Shaun Thanks Shaun. Glad to have you aboard. I look forward to hearing more from you in the future as you travel this journey.

Todd,

Great teachings. Now, for those readers who still doubt that Todd's teachings are doable, consider my personal example.

At age 22, graduated from college; Age 24, got married; age 25, bought our first home; age 27, first child; age 28, bought first income property; age 30, second child; age 31, bought second home, age 32, first retirement.

Drove my wife crazy at home ... you can only mow the lawn once a week and spend 1 hour per day on investments, if that much. So went and got a part time job. Age 34, moved back to the more expensive SF Bay Area; age 40, second retirement.

So you see, it can be done; lots of peanut butter sandwiches, my wife cutting my hair, and hard work fixing property and researching the investment markets.

Geez guys, why not just pick a very conservative money mgr. or a simple conservative service & stick with them for 10yrs., why torture yourselves with these arcane ideas?

Dan Ferris, 12% Letter!

Mark Ford/Tom Dyson, The Palm Beach Letter

I'm willing to bet that both of these letters will outperform most of your ideas w/o all the sacrifice you guys have to endure over the same 10 years!

Compounding has always been the best way to grow your wealth. Plowing back all dividends will make the test even more lucrative, trust me, I've managed money during the '80's!

Anyone can do this.
What were you living on when you were in college?

It is 2011 and I am a junior in college in the US living on approximately 10,000 a year. No, my parents aren't supporting me, I pay for all my living costs including a car and college tuition is paid for by scholarships. I have zero debt and this isn't going to change. Why increase my expenditures just because I may get a higher paying job later on?
I am living perfectly fine now and I will continue to for many years. The only necessary increase in spending that I foresee will be increased cost of living/inflation (which I can only hope my income will keep pace with)

I can see myself retired by age 35.
Thanks for the great read!

@Tim - You're welcome, Tim. Thanks for stopping by and adding to the discussion.

@Shaun I can relate to your comments regarding student loans, and would like to share my personal story.

In 2000 at the age of 30, I decided to change careers and pursue my lifelong dream of becoming a professional pilot. I left my job and moved to New Mexico to attend flight school and took out some fairly hefty student loans. When I graduated in 2002 the job market had completely fell flat due to 9/11 and I was unable to get a job flying. My total debt load was $72k (including my truck loan and credit cards).

I did get a job at a commuter airline a year later where I worked until January of 2010. My first 3 years at the airline I made less than $25,000 for the year (I know shocking isn't it?) which caused my credit card balance to rise; it is hard to live off $1200 a month when your student loan payments are $500 a month. I somehow managed to pay off my truck, but unfortunately, it died and I needed a new car in 2007. I bought a used one, but had to take out a loan for $14k to do it.

I also started making decent money in 2007 when I "upgraded" to Captain. I first paid off my credit cards, then my car, and just last month finally paid off my student loans. Admittedly, I really only worked hard on the student loans starting in the fall of 2009, but was able to pay them off 1 month ahead of my plan.

Unknowingly, I used the same basic principal that is at the heart of the retirement plan presented here. I lived on roughly 25% of my income and used the other 75% to pay off debt. Now, I didn't plan this, but I did scrimp and scrap to maximize my payments every month. Its true, it can be fun and is very rewarding to do. Getting out of debt was paramount for me, and I learned how to be frugal in order to do it.

With the success I've had in paying off the debt I now have a lot more confidence moving forward and am saving the money that was used for debt. Not sure if I'll retire in 10 years, but its nice to know that I could if I continue living as I have for the last 10.

Good luck!

Hi, Todd. Great post, great discussion to which I would like to add:

I achieved financial independence the "old fashioned" way, but that road is closing as we speak.

I earned a Federal government pension with annual cost of living increases and health care for life. I also invested in Real Estate. As I neared the time I would begin drawing my pension I pared down the investment real estate to one paid-off property making me $1000 a month (net).

My monthly income is almost three times my monthly expenses and my only debt is a small mortgage (<$70,000) on my primary residence. My total cost of housing (PITI) is under $500 a month.

But none of that happened by accident; I made a plan and worked it. I have a considerable amount in cash but it superfluous in my case because of my monthly income. Still, it feels good somehow to know it is sitting there and readily accessible.

I also have a publishing business and do some coaching and conduct seminars which add even more income streams; again, all part of the plan.

But what I figured out a few years ago is that what most people are after is not total financial independence. The real issue for most of those unhappy with the daily grind of the five-day, forty-hour workweek is too much work.

The answer to that issue is not financial independence. I mean, it could be, but it is unnecessary. THE ANSWER IS LESS WORK. I have termed that answer to the less work issue the four-day weekend. But like achieving FI, the sticky wicket even when you are working three days a week remains health-care.

Although we have health insurance, we do not have dental insurance. The best answer is preventative care to avoid the typical expenses in that regard. But sometimes, you need a dentist, regardless. My family and I live close to Mexico and we have a dentist there in addition to our dentist here.

Our US policy does cover routine dental exams and two cleanings a year. For those, we go to our US dentist. When she told my wife she needed two wisdom teeth extracted, we first got an estimate from the US dentist she referred us to and then from our Mexican dentist.

The US price? $600 per extraction. She had it done in Mexico instead: Total cost? $90. We do not live close to Mexico by accident; yet again, all part of the planning process. Keep up the good work!

I can do better than this. How about living in a cardboard box under the bridge and eating out of the local Taco Bell's tash bin. Heck, I could retire right now if I do that. What a useless article.

@Joe Bob - I approved this comment to allow the naysayers a voice. However, you should use a real name and a real email address when posting comments otherwise they will be treated as spam.

Hi Todd. Nice article. I've been reading Jacob's blog for years, and I find him inspirational, though I'm not pursuing extreme early retirement myself. (I don't hate my career as much as he did.) Jacob's blog is great for keeping me frugal: it reminds me that there's a LOT more room on the frugal end of the spectrum, even if it sometimes doesn't appear that way when I look at the people around me.

(FYI, I think you mean the argument is "moot", not "mute".)

@Patrick - Ha! Thanks for the correction on "moot" vs. "mute". Oops.

I'll change it in the article and leave this in the comments for posterity.

Much appreciated...

Wow, I am reading a lot of doubt through these comments here. I believe that if you really want it, it can be done. Maybe it's 10yrs for one person, and 14yrs for another, but it can be done. I know that it's hard to stop being a consumer. Driving that new truck definitely feels good, and so does eating out several times a week. Who doesn't want to be waited on? But all that will prevent you from being free. I no longer want to be a slave to the lender.

I have already cut my cable down to $15/month, I have completely cut out my Internet service and land line, eating out is very rare, my son wears hand me downs, I buy my clothes at WalMart because I refuse to pay $15 for a sweater, my grocery bill is less than $100/week and yes we do eat about 90% fresh organic food, I assign a job to every dollar I bring home, and I use cash because it hurts more to spend and it's easier for me to track my spending, etc etc etc. Each small change you make will help.

I won't lie, it does take a lot of sacrifices. Our vehicles are paid off and the only debt we have is our mortgage. With these sacrifices I am hoping to be mortgage free in about 15yrs, or less. You can do it, but you have to want it really bad.

@Melyssa - Well said!

I can totally agree with this concept. I am 37, married, no kids, living in SE Asia. We have been out here about 5 years and am making a good salary and saving nearly all of it. Actual expenses here are $3k a month (we bought our condo in cash) and that is living pretty large. I make $270 - $350k (depends on the variable bonus) a year so am living on 10 - 12% of our pre-tax salary. After tax salary is about $180k - $240k so living expenses are 15 - 20% of take home pay.

The job is incredibly difficult and I'm finding it easy to burn out- manage a company of 700 people and am working 12-14 hours a day, with weekends generally off.

We have a net worth of $2.5 million, with $250k as the value of the condo, and $250k in 401k investments. The remaining $2 million is in different cash accounts earning between 0% - 1.5% interest a year.

Using your formula I think we can easily retire with a draw down of 3%. What I worry about is the following:

1. Losing principle if investing in stocks.
2. Losing principle if investing in bonds unless I hold them to maturity.
3. Seems good to keep cash handy to deploy it into an opportunity with some upside
4. Fear of losing my skills- a 55 year retirement is quite daunting
5. Fear of not having skills to earn a good salary while having inflation / market disruptions eating away at our principle.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Jack.

@Jack - Congratulations - you've done well for yourself.

At the risk of being self-serving you are a likely candidate for my personal financial coaching services. Based on your comment, there are several things we could work on right from the start that would create tremendous value for you...

Investment strategy - Holding 2 million in cash is a long-term prescription for poverty given inflation expectations worldwide in our funny money world. There are ways to manage risk (defensive investment strategy) while still pursuing gains (offensive investment strategy). (Side note - your comment talked about a "drawdown of 3%" but what I mentioned in the article was 3% of income on a dividend stock portfolio - zero drawdown of principal. Hope that clarifies.)

New Retirement - I would also work with you on transitioning into an entirely different concept in retirement - what I call "The New Retirement". It is not about ending work and doing nothing. It is about using your freedom to create a life you are so excited and passionate about that you can't wait to wake up in the morning and get going. Rather than retire from work, you build a life that is so fulfilling that you never want to retire from it.

I have another client in Singapore with a very similar situation. We use Skype with him calling me early A.M. there before work which is afternoon for me.

Anyway, if the ideas sound interesting I offer a no-cost strategy session here to see if the fit is right.

Hope that helps.

I'm a new reader and little confused by how you can live indefinitely on 3% spendable interest with an inflation average of 3-4%. Even if they are both set at 3%, the cost of living (initially 15,000/yr, say) will outgrow the interest income because that first year it already eats up your interest income and from then on out it becomes more than your interest income. so at year 10, the living expenses are around 20k/year after rising 3% a year. your nest egg is already down to 490k and decreases exponentially down to 0 at year 35. (ie. after the first year your nest egg grew to 515k, but then you use 15450 of it). unless you are earning more interest than cost of living, isn't it a losing battle over the long haul?

@Shawn - The problem assumption in your analysis is that the income is static. Historically, a properly built dividend stock portfolio increases the income at a rate faster than inflation. No guarantees for the future, but that is the relationship in the past. In other words, dividend payouts increase over time. Hope that clarifies.

Excellent article - actually, the tendencies of human behavior in general across most disciplines is reflected in your article. Losing weight, quitting smoking, anything that requires consistent discipline can be difficult for many people. I've followed ERE and the Early Retirement Board (started a long time ago when I read Terhorst's book). The math for short times is consistent, as you say. Most people are not willing to make the sacrifices - or are unwilling to find other ways to obtain the lifestyle for less money. The book "Your Money or Your Life" says it all - money is a way of quantifying your time in terms of 'banking' it for present or future needs/desires. If you are willing to trade having money with using your time, you can find ways to do things....however, you need to have the time. A simple example, I haven't purchased a book in a year. I use my library for books, DVDs, books-on-tape, CDs, etc. Sometimes I have to wait awhile for a 'newer' item, but that waiting allows me to enjoy that piece of entertainment for free (yes, I know, our taxes pay for it-therefore I don't pay for it twice when I use the library). There are many resources available that allow you to become creative with your time to gain lifestyle benefits.

With the above, one could argue that what you 'make' or spend in money in a year doesn't necessarily reflect your lifestyle - looks are deceiving.

Thanks for taking the time to write the article and the blog - I enjoy reading it.

@Deserat - Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Interesting point you make about the library. I've been using it quite a bit lately too. I like it for both the cost savings, the eco-friendly, and the clutter reduction. I just got sick of reading a book once then storing it on a shelf. I sold cases of my investment research books on ebay to get rid of stuff and gave away as many other books as I could find good homes for. Now I try to borrow from the library as often as possible. With 2 kids and 2 adults as active readers it all adds up - both money and clutter.

I believe you mean to write "the argument is moot."

I find it ironic you dwell on the math without showing some simple plots (cost basis, future monthly income, etc. for a range of inflation and savings rates) and discussing the potentially catastrophic consequences of chance events. Not having a good buffer is costly; focusing on the mean is dangerous.

Nice article. I've been reading the extreme early retirement blog for a few months now. It is in alignment with my personal values. I'm 45, have two young kids and make around 55k a year. I'm approaching living off of 50% of my income living a middle-class lifestyle in Phoenix. I drive a car and own a home. I have student loans and health insurance as well as the responsibility of two young kids. It can be done if you are willing to get creative with your life. It even can become fun.

Regarding the health insurance issue, my personal belief is that the best health insurance is to be healthy. Few Americans take the time to eat right and work out enough to be really healthy. It takes time and discipline but little in the way of money. I have catastrophic health insurance for myself and my two kids that cost around $200 a month.

@Chris - Thanks for your input. It is good to hear the direct experience from someone who is walking the talk.

I have been reading this blog for quite some time now and I have noticed that the demographics of the followers seem to be in the middle to late stages of their careers looking for financial freedom. I might be incorrect on this but is my guess based upon most of the responses. I only bring this up because some of my considerations/hurdles to become financially free are quite different and are never mentioned on this site. This is due to education costs.

My generation is currently sitting with a lot of student debt and is probably the biggest obstacle to becoming financially free. I know people that are paying $1000/month for student loans and are struggling to make it. So trying to make it on 20% of your gross income is never going to happen because it does not even pay your student loan…let along living expenses. In my opinion this is going to be the next sub-prime mess in our country because the younger generation is going to just stop paying their student loans.

Hypothetically, imagine having $80k in student debt making $45k a year or imagine having another mortgage on top of your existing one. That is the kind of pressure that is placed on the younger generation.

Todd, I think this would be a suggestion for you next book in your other blog request for help.

@Shaun - Got it. Thanks for sharing.

As a side note, your situation is not as unique or generational as you might believe.

Debt is debt - whether it be home mortgage debt from the older generation, consumer debt from the mid-range, or student loan debt from the young upstarts. The form changes but the principle remains the same.

Debt is the antithesis of freedom. It is the nemesis (unless it is productive debt for business or income producing real estate where revenue exceeds cost).

In other words, your sentiments are heard, and your situation is shared by more than you imagined.

Frugality, as you point out, this may not be for everyone. That said, there are at least some who can save 80 percent of pre tax income for over 20 years. I have a sibling who has done this on a middle six figure income.

Love the concept, but how the heck do you do this and still pay for health care in this country? Seems like most of the ERE folks are young and do one of two things: ignore it or live in a country that has socialized medicine. I've done the work, I've saved the money, but I'm unwilling to go "naked" with regards to health care. Sure there are high deductible policies, but how does one afford decent healthcare on 1200 a month?

@ Diane - Thanks for your input.

In my opinion, this is the only legitimate complaint I've seen surface on this strategy. For those where it applies, you've pretty well described the choices...

Ignore it and carry the risk.
Live in a country with socialized medicine where the problem doesn't exist.

I carry full health insurance for my family as an independent and it is horrific. Our health care industry is one of the greatest risks for people who pursue freedom in our country.

The other thing that is not stated in this article because I didn't want to detract from the primary theme is you can use extreme early retirement at a low level just to get the basics covered while using the free time generated to follow your dreams to produce additional income. For example, maybe you want to become a writer or build a niche website. These things can be monetized which then supplements income. This doesn't directly address your concern, but it might be a way around it.

In short, there is no clear answer to the health care problem in the U.S.A that I'm aware of. Carry the risk, make more to cover the risk, or move to a country where the risk doesn't exist. That's pretty much it.

Good article Todd, I enjoyed it.

For most people, the 'spend what you make' principle is 100% accurate - as incomes rise, so do their expenses, many times over the expenses - for the group with that mentality, the concepts presented in the article are unbelievable.

I have always believed people will find the money for what they really want (I was in sales for a short time and saw it firsthand) - likewise if you are 100% committed to early retirement, you will find a way to make it work.

I have a co-worker - never married, lives modestly (although not at the levels described above!) enjoys travel, etc. But he is ready to retire very comfortably right now at age 43!
I have a family and am not in his circumstance, but proves it is very do-able!

@Bridget & @Tony - Thank you for joining the conversation and sharing your thoughts.

Thanks Todd for another great article. I wholeheartedly agree you can retire in 10 years (or less). The reason this does not seem possible for many is because most confuse "wants" with "needs". In other words, what we think we "need" is most often a "want". Basically, like you said, "lifestyle choices".

I like the idea. But it seems unrealistic. Unless you are fortunate enough to be in a dual income family with each member having a decent paycheck, or single with extremely low expenses, this seems darn right impossible.

You don't mention some very important considerations, such as inflation adjusted costs of living, and insurance (medical, dental, home, vehicle, life) costs. Also, I've never met anyone with a family that is able to live on 10-20% of their take home income, unless they are banking oodles more than everyone around them.

I absolutely endorse saving as much as possible, and understand that many people desperately want to leave the workaday world, the sooner the better. But I think creating an expectation of being able to live on so little may set your readers up for disappointment, unless, as I have said, their incomes and lifestyle are conducive to this type of extreme frugality, or they have a decent amount of economic outpatient care from friends and family.

Pat S.

@Pat - Please read the post again. Every issue you raised is covered.

I provided links to communities where people are supporting each other and walking the talk. It is realistic. Not easy, but realistic.

I also point out in the post and in the comments the issues of inflation and compound return effects for longer time horizons and why only the short time horizons (high savings rates) are scientifically valid.

I also discuss the risk of insurance for countries that don't provide national health care plans.

It is all a question of values and priorities. Nothing more... nothing less.

An interesting number on that list is 50%. If you just started a family, that's how much you'd have to save if you want to retire when your kids head off to college.

Here are the results of my formula above:
Savings Years
10% 42
15% 37
20% 32
30% 26
40% 21
50% 17
60% 14
70% 10
80% 7

@Steve - Thanks for breaking out the formula into numbers than my non-math readers can digest. Much appreciated.

I also want to re-state a caution from the article above - longer time periods are dramatically affected by inflation and compound return assumptions.

In other words, the short time periods are mathematically accurate. It is science. I'll stand by that.

The same is NOT true for long time periods because the compounded affect of small changes in assumptions becomes dramatic.

I'm comfortable claiming "science" out to about 60% or 14 years (on the high side) but much beyond that significant uncertainty enters the picture and you need the knowledge contained in the ebook I sell "How Much Money Do You Need To Retire". That's not a pitch - it's just the mathematical reality of how the numbers work.

If anyone wants to calculate how many years Y it would take to retire on a given savings rate S, here is the formula I worked out:
Y = ceiling(ln((1-S)/(3%*S)*8%+1)/ln(1+8%))

I believe the strong naysayer comments perfectly illustrate your point as to why so few succeed at this. It truly does come down to personal values. I am fully aware that this strategy is not suitable for most folks, so some dissent is expected. However, please don't immediately jeer at the ideas presented here and cite your belief that they won't work for doing so. These ideas may not coincide with your personal values, but that doesn't mean the ideas aren't valid. They will work if you WANT them to work. If your reaction to them is "Hogwash!" or something similar, they will not work for you. The cool thing is that these ideas working or not working for you is neither right nor wrong. That said, I encourage people to be receptive. After careful consideration, you don't have to agree, but please be receptive.

@Tony - Thanks for sharing you thoughts.

One of the unspoken secrets of being a coach is the daily practice of training your mind for acceptance.

I try to maintain a respectful tone in these comments to foster a positive environment for learning and growing. However, this post attracted a lot of attention from some publishers with very large followings who linked to it and brought many new members to our community (thank you). When you add to it the fact that the post had a little "edge" to it anyway, it was only expected to attract some aggressive comments.

The only thing I will add is that people have many varied viewpoints, but most are only able to see the truth in their own.

One of my favorite stories illustrating this idea is the 3 Blind Men and The Elephant as told in one of my favorite articles on this site.

Hope you enjoy it...

I enjoyed your post, agree with most of it. I believe that percentage of income saved dominates the financial success equation (even for entrepreneurs). I understand that $14,000 per year was just an example, but given that health care expenses in this country are more than $8,000 per person and that for people over 50 it is worse than that, I really doubt anyone could live on $14,000 and be adequately insured at the same time. The plan to go with no (or insufficient) health insurance might work for someone without any savings (they can use Medicaid), but for someone trying to preserve assets I do not think this is very wise. Even if this retiree could find high deductible health insurance in the individual market for say $5,000 per year at age 50, by the time they are 60 their premiums would likely be well over $10,000 per year (or $20,000 for a couple). I have saved many times more than a $14,000 a year nest egg and keep working only because of the health care issue, even a frugal person can’t get around the fact that health care is hugely expensive and not something they can really opt out of.

@Mike - I believe you bring up a valid point. For anyone not qualified for Medicare in this country or who does not live in a country with public health care (Canada, U.K., France, etc.) that introduces a risk. Not carrying proper health insurance while building assets places a large risk on the assets should a health issue arise. There are solutions (one spouse works part-time for company providing health insurance, move to a country with public health care, etc.), and your point is completely valid.

Thanks for sharing.

While I appreciate the article, pray tell... how do you find EIGHT percent return in the "new normal" world???? Only by taking risks... which may well lead to 2008-style returns.

Good article, but deficient. And I already DO live very frugally and save more than $2k/month. Let me know where you can find that guaranteed 8%.... is the author willing to give me 8% a year????

@Jim - Congratulations on your savings. You are way ahead of most. The next key is investment strategy.

I teach investment processes focused on risk management. There are no guarantees; however, the processes I teach successfully protected capital during the 2008 decline and reliably participated in the upside so that the net compounded return over time (both historically and in real time) is in excess of 8% compounded - all without horrific risk.

It is too involved to explain in a single blog comment but if you spend some time on this site you will find plenty of clues that point the way. In addition, I will be teaching an investing class as part of the 7 Steps To 7 Figures curriculum later this year that will explain everything in excruciating detail. There are no secrets and it is all public domain knowledge. I've just assembled it in a specific way so it makes perfect sense to people once they are taught it (based on coaching client results).

Hope that helps.

Life is too short to live a "poverty lifestyle". Plus, how much fun can you have on $15,000 a year! Sure if you were living on the beach in Philippines you might get by, but in America, more specifically California. Rent alone in a low income area is minimum $12,000 a year. That's not frugal thats just cheap.

@Harry - Thanks for joining the discussion...

As I said, it is not the perfect fit for everyone. Different people build different wealth plans based on their unique circumstances.

Just to be fair, real people are working this strategy and consider that "enough".

The key concept is the percentage saved - not the dollars spent.

You face two choices using this strategy. You can increase percent of income spent which increases time required, or you can increase income so that you can spend more while maintaining same percentage spent.

The other alternative is to use a totally different strategy such as real estate or business entrepreneurship which is a totally different discussion.

Where do you live...in a CAVE. There is nowhere I know that you can live in this country and make 48,000 and live on $15000. Let's use the DC area. Rent alone on a one bedroom is 1300. Get serious. If you can live on $15K, why are you selling books to survive???

@Martha - I know it sounds unlikely but real people are actually doing it. Follow the link provided by Jacob in the first comment above to the EarlyRetirementExtreme forum and see for yourself. Also, you are not required to make it work on that amount. For example, my kids school tuition amounts to as much as some of the frugalists are living on. You can choose to raise your income. The percentage saved is the key.

@Martha:

So just for the record you can live on 15000 a year if you open your eyes. I know because my family of 5 does it every year. Not because we are saving money but because we only make that much. Further more DC is on of the most expensive places to live in the country so you can't really use that as an example for rent I don't even pay half that for my 3 bedroom. There are ways to have healthcare and fun on this low income too for example my family likes the outdoors so to go camping for the weekend it costs us 30 bucks, 20 in fuel and 10 in food and that's all 5 of us and our 3 sons eat alot. Also we ride motorcycles so for a weekend of fun riding it costs us 50 bucks again 10 for snacks and food and 40 for fuel. If we want to see a movie the local theater runs family night on Tuesday where you get in for 2.50 a person. Our local pool has season passes for 20 dollars a person so we can go whenever. Having fun does not have to cost a ton of money. And for healthcare my 3 boys have Medicaid but my wife and I can't get it so we have health insurance that covers 5 visits a year to the doctor major medical and 15 dollar Co pay on scripts. It costs us 80 per person a month and that's not through an employer. You people complain about not being able to lower yourself to that level of income because you don't want to give up that Starbucks run on the way to work but just remember there are people that live on that much not because they want but because they have to and honestly this Guy makes a ton of sense if I had the money to save like that you bet your ass I would hell if I had the money to buy this guys book I would

Here are some journals/progress reports from people who are pursuing FI. Most are just getting started, so you can see how it works in the beginning.
http://forum.earlyretirementextreme.com/forum.php?id=9

I consider Jacob one of the experts on the frugality path to building wealth as discussed here. He runs the blog http://earlyretirementextreme.com as mentioned in this post which I highly recommend as the best resource for my readers wanting to pursue this strategy. He wrote a thoughtful analysis of this post at http://earlyretirementextreme.com/why-so-few-succeed.html which adds additional insights for anyone interested. Thanks, Jacob.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] R. Tresidder presents How Anyone Can Retire In 10 Years (Or Less!) posted at Financial [...]

FinancialMentor.Com Featured In...